Recruiters, Staffers, Agents: All Breeds & Flavors – A Field Guide

This article is for entertainment purposes only.

If you’ve ever tried to navigate the hiring world—whether as a job seeker, an employer, or someone considering a career in recruiting—you’ve probably noticed something confusing:

Everyone calls themselves a “recruiter.”

The person cold-calling you about a contract warehouse job? Recruiter.

The executive search consultant building a C-suite for a Fortune 500? Recruiter.

The in-house talent acquisition specialist at Google? Recruiter.

The independent headhunter who only works with biotech startups? Recruiter.

But these are not the same animal.

Calling them all “recruiters” is like calling a Chihuahua and a Great Dane both “dogs.” Technically true, but wildly misleading if you’re trying to figure out which one to bring home.

This field guide breaks down the major breeds of recruiters, staffing agencies, and talent agents—how they operate, how they get paid, who they actually serve, and which ones you should run from.

Spoiler: They’re not all created equal. Some are professionals. Some are parasites. Knowing the difference could save you thousands of dollars, months of time, or years of career misery.

Let’s get into it.

---

Species 1: Executive Search Firms (The Apex Predators)

Also known as: Headhunters, Retained Search, Executive Recruiters

What They Do

Executive search firms find senior-level talent—C-suite executives, VPs, directors, specialized experts. They’re hired by companies to fill strategic, high-stakes positions that can’t be posted on a job board.

These aren’t your “apply online and hope for the best” roles. These are “we need a CFO who’s scaled three SaaS companies and has deep relationships in venture capital” roles.

The search firm operates more like a consulting engagement than a transaction. They:

• Deeply understand the client’s business, culture, and strategic needs
• Map the competitive landscape to identify top talent
• Discreetly approach passive candidates (people not actively looking)
• Vet candidates thoroughly (background, references, cultural fit)
• Facilitate negotiations and manage the offer process
• Sometimes provide onboarding support

How They Get Paid

Retained fees. This is the key distinction.

The client pays upfront, in stages:

• 1/3 when the search begins
• 1/3 at 30 days (or when candidate slate is presented)
• 1/3 when the hire is made

Fee range: 25-35% of the candidate’s total first-year compensation (base + bonus + equity).

For a $300K executive, that’s $75K-$105K in fees.

Critical point: They get paid whether they fill the role or not (though most contracts have clauses requiring a successful placement eventually). The upfront payment means they’re incentivized to do thorough work, not just throw bodies at the problem.

Who They Serve

The employer. Unambiguously.

But because they’re paid to find the best candidate (not just any candidate), they treat talent with respect. A bad placement damages their reputation in a small, elite market.

Candidates benefit indirectly:

• If you’re good enough to be on their radar, you’re in demand
• They present opportunities you’d never find publicly
• They negotiate on your behalf (higher comp = higher fee for them)
• Being placed by a top firm is a career credential

Work Environment (for recruiters who work here)

Prestigious. This is the top of the recruiting food chain.

• Pay: $80K-$150K base + bonuses; senior partners make $300K-$1M+
• Culture: Professional, strategic, consultative
• Workload: Fewer searches, deeper work, longer timelines
• Respect: High—you’re a trusted advisor to CEOs and boards
• Career path: Clear progression to partner level

Downsides:

• Intense pressure (you’re dealing with C-suite and board-level clients)
• Long hours (relationship-building never stops)
• High barrier to entry (need proven track record or Ivy pedigree)

Quality of Experience

For job seekers:

• If they contact you: You’re being considered for a senior role. Take the call.
• If you contact them: They won’t talk to you unless you’re already at the right level.
• Red flags: None, if it’s a legitimate firm (Korn Ferry, Spencer Stuart, Heidrick & Struggles, etc.)
• Green flags: Discrete, professional, well-researched outreach

For employers:

• Pros: Get access to talent you couldn’t find otherwise; thorough vetting; strategic partnership
• Cons: Expensive; slower process; overkill for non-executive roles
• Best for: C-suite, VP-level, specialized senior roles where a bad hire costs millions

Industry Respect Level

10/10. This is the Michelin-star restaurant of recruiting.

Examples

• Korn Ferry
• Spencer Stuart
• Heidrick & Struggles
• Egon Zehnder
• Russell Reynolds

Verdict: If an executive search firm contacts you, pay attention. If you’re hiring for senior leadership, they’re worth the investment.

---

Species 2: Corporate/In-House Recruiters (The House Pets)

Also known as: Talent Acquisition, Internal Recruiters, TA Specialists

What They Do

Corporate recruiters work directly for one company. They’re full-time employees hired to fill positions across the organization.

Unlike external agencies, they’re not selling candidates to multiple clients. They’re building one talent pipeline for one employer.

Responsibilities include:

• Posting jobs and managing applications
• Sourcing candidates (LinkedIn, referrals, networks)
• Screening resumes and conducting initial interviews
• Coordinating with hiring managers
• Managing candidate experience
• Sometimes employer branding and recruiting strategy

How They Get Paid

Salary + benefits. No commission, no placement fees.

Pay range: $50K-$90K for junior/mid-level; $90K-$150K+ for senior TA leaders.

Some companies offer bonuses tied to hiring goals, but it’s not the primary compensation driver.

Who They Serve

The employer. They’re employees of the company, so their loyalty is clear.

But because they’re building the company’s talent brand and reputation, they generally treat candidates better than external agencies. A bad candidate experience reflects on the company.

Candidates get:

• Direct access to the actual employer
• Transparency about the role and culture
• No middleman taking a cut
• Consistent communication (usually)

Work Environment (for recruiters)

Stable and relatively sane.

• Pay: Predictable salary, benefits, 401k, PTO
• Culture: Depends on the company, but usually professional
• Workload: Busy but manageable; no cold-calling strangers
• Respect: Seen as strategic HR partners (in good companies)
• Career path: TA Specialist → Senior Recruiter → TA Manager → Head of Talent

Downsides:

• Bureaucracy (especially in large companies)
• Limited to one company’s roles (less variety)
• Can be laid off if hiring freezes

Quality of Experience

For job seekers:

• Pros: Direct communication with employer; no hidden agendas; transparent process
• Cons: Can be slow (corporate approval processes); may ghost if you’re not a fit
• Red flags: Disorganized process, lack of follow-up (reflects on company culture)
• Green flags: Clear timeline, responsive communication, transparency

For employers:

• Pros: Recruiter understands your culture; aligned incentives; builds institutional knowledge
• Cons: Fixed cost (salary whether they’re hiring or not); limited bandwidth
• Best for: Companies with ongoing hiring needs; building strong talent pipelines

Industry Respect Level

7/10. Solid, respectable career path. Not as prestigious as executive search, but far more stable.

Examples

You don’t know their names—they work for:

• Google’s TA team
• Amazon’s recruiting org
• Any large company’s HR department

Verdict: If you’re a job seeker, applying directly and working with in-house recruiters is usually your best bet. If you’re a recruiter, this is a good work-life balance option.

---

Species 3: Boutique/Specialist Recruiters (The Bloodhounds)

Also known as: Niche Recruiters, Specialist Headhunters, Industry-Focused Firms

What They Do

Boutique firms focus on one industry, one function, or one type of role. They’re small (often 2-15 people) and trade on deep expertise rather than volume.

Examples:

• Fintech recruiting firms that only place quantitative traders
• Healthcare recruiters specializing in physician executives
• AI/ML recruiting firms that only work with deep learning engineers
• Legal recruiters focusing on intellectual property attorneys

They operate similarly to executive search but at a smaller scale and often on contingency.

How They Get Paid

Contingency fees (usually): 18-25% of first-year salary, paid only when hire is made.

Some boutique firms use retained search for senior roles.

Key difference from volume staffing agencies: They’re selective about what roles they work on. They won’t take every job posting—only ones where their expertise adds value.

Who They Serve

Both employer and candidate, because reputation matters.

In niche markets, everyone knows everyone. A bad placement or dishonest recruiter gets blacklisted fast.

Employers get:

• Deep industry knowledge
• Access to passive talent
• Pre-vetted candidates who actually fit
• Strategic advice on comp, market trends, etc.

Candidates get:

• Career advice from someone who knows the niche
• Access to unadvertised roles
• Honest assessment of opportunities
• Long-term relationship (they’ll call you for future roles)

Work Environment (for recruiters)

Demanding but rewarding.

• Pay: $60K-$100K base + commission; top performers make $150K-$300K+
• Culture: Small team, entrepreneurial, expertise-driven
• Workload: Moderate to high; building deep relationships takes time
• Respect: High within their niche; unknown outside it
• Career path: Often partner track or spin off to start own firm

Downsides:

• Smaller earning ceiling than executive search
• Risk if the niche dies (e.g., specializing in a dying technology)
• Still sales-driven (need to close deals)

Quality of Experience

For job seekers:

• Pros: They actually understand your skills; won’t waste your time; career-long relationship
• Cons: Selective (won’t work with you if you’re not in their niche)
• Red flags: Pushing roles outside your stated interests; lack of industry knowledge
• Green flags: Demonstrates deep expertise; asks smart questions; transparent about process

For employers:

• Pros: Faster fills for hard roles; higher quality candidates; market intelligence
• Cons: Higher fees than job boards; limited to their network
• Best for: Specialized, hard-to-fill roles; niche industries; when quality > speed

Industry Respect Level

8/10. Respected for expertise. Not as prestigious as exec search, but seen as pros.

Examples

• Smaller firms you’ve never heard of (that’s the point—they’re niche)
• Often named after founders or the specialty (e.g., “Quantum Computing Talent Partners”)

Verdict: If you’re in a specialized field, these are your best bet. If you’re hiring for niche roles, worth the premium.

---

Species 4: Independent Recruiters (The Lone Wolves)

Also known as: Freelance Recruiters, Solo Practitioners, Independent Talent Scouts

What They Do

Independent recruiters work for themselves. No agency, no corporate employer—just them and their network.

They typically:

• Work with 3-7 client companies at a time
• Focus on industries or roles they know well
• Build long-term relationships rather than churn volume
• Operate lean (low overhead, high autonomy)

How They Get Paid

Contingency fees: 15-25% of first-year salary, paid when hire is made.

Sometimes retained: For senior roles or exclusive partnerships.

Critical difference: They keep 100% of the fee (minus expenses). No agency taking 80% of their commission.

Who They Serve

Depends entirely on the individual.

Good independents serve both employer and candidate, building reputation on quality.

Bad independents are just ex-agency recruiters running the same playbook solo.

The key differentiator: Do they have real expertise and relationships, or are they just spam-calling LinkedIn profiles?

Work Environment (for the recruiter)

Total freedom, total risk.

• Pay: $0-$500K+ depending on placements (highly variable)
• Culture: You set it (work from home, set your hours)
• Workload: Entirely self-determined
• Respect: Based on reputation (can be high or non-existent)
• Career path: Scale to boutique firm, stay solo, or burn out

Downsides:

• No steady income (feast or famine)
• No benefits, no safety net
• You do everything (sales, recruiting, admin, accounting)
• Hard to compete with agencies on volume

Quality of Experience

For job seekers:

• Pros: Personalized service; they actually care about fit; transparent (usually)
• Cons: Limited reach (just one person’s network)
• Red flags: Generic outreach; pushy sales tactics; no specialization
• Green flags: Knows you/your work; specialized expertise; transparent about fees

For employers:

• Pros: Cost-effective; dedicated attention; flexible terms
• Cons: Limited bandwidth; single point of failure; uneven quality
• Best for: Small/mid-size companies; specialized roles; companies tired of big agencies

Industry Respect Level

Varies wildly: 3/10 to 9/10 depending on the individual.

Top independents are highly respected. Bottom-feeders are ignored.

Examples

You won’t know their names unless you’re in their network. That’s the point.

Verdict: High variance. Vet carefully. Check references. If they’re good, they’re worth it. If they’re bad, they’re just an ex-agency recruiter without the overhead.

---

Species 5: RPO (Recruitment Process Outsourcing) (The Outsourced Department)

Also known as: Managed Recruiting Services, Embedded Recruiters

What They Do

RPO providers take over some or all of a company’s recruiting function. Instead of hiring internal recruiters, the company contracts an RPO firm to handle it.

The RPO team often works on-site or is deeply embedded with the client. They use the client’s brand, follow the client’s process, and function like in-house recruiters—but they’re employed by the RPO vendor.

How They Get Paid

Monthly retainer or cost-per-hire.

Not commission-based. The client pays a fixed amount for the service, and the RPO is measured on metrics like:

• Time-to-fill
• Quality of hire
• Cost efficiency
• Candidate satisfaction

Who They Serve

The employer, but in a more strategic partnership than transactional agencies.

Because RPO is long-term (often multi-year contracts), they’re incentivized to build sustainable recruiting operations, not just churn placements.

Candidates experience it like dealing with in-house recruiters (because functionally, that’s what RPO recruiters are).

Work Environment (for recruiters)

More stable than agency, less than corporate.

• Pay: $50K-$90K salary (less commission pressure than agencies)
• Culture: Varies by RPO firm; generally more professional than volume staffing
• Workload: Busy but structured; less cold-calling than agencies
• Respect: Moderate; seen as better than agency, not as good as in-house
• Career path: Move to in-house roles or senior RPO management

Downsides:

• Can be laid off if client contracts end
• Less autonomy than in-house (vendor relationship dynamics)
• Still serving someone else’s brand

Quality of Experience

For job seekers:

• Pros: Professional process; direct employer relationship (mostly)
• Cons: May not know you’re dealing with RPO vs. in-house
• Red flags: Same as in-house (disorganization, ghosting)
• Green flags: Transparent, responsive, structured process

For employers:

• Pros: Scalable recruiting without hiring full-time staff; expertise; tech/tools included
• Cons: Less control; vendor management overhead; can be expensive
• Best for: High-volume hiring; companies without mature TA function; scaling rapidly

Industry Respect Level

6/10. Seen as professional but not prestigious.

Examples

• Tapfin
• PeopleScout
• Allegis Global Solutions
• Pontoon

Verdict: Solid middle ground. Better than volume staffing, not as integrated as in-house.

---

Species 6: Contract Recruiters (The Mercenaries)

Also known as: Fractional Recruiters, Interim Recruiters, Project-Based Recruiters

What They Do

Contract recruiters are hired by companies for specific projects or time periods:

• Covering a maternity leave
• Handling a hiring surge
• Leading a specific initiative (e.g., “hire 20 engineers in 6 months”)

They work on-site or remotely, embedded with the team, but for a defined period.

How They Get Paid

Hourly or project-based fees.

Range: $50-$150/hour depending on expertise and market.

No commission. They’re paid for time/work, not placements.

Who They Serve

The employer, directly.

They function like in-house recruiters during the engagement.

Work Environment (for the recruiter)

Flexible but unstable.

• Pay: $75K-$200K+ annually (if you keep projects rolling)
• Culture: Varies by client
• Workload: Intense during projects, downtime between gigs
• Respect: Moderate to high (depends on expertise)
• Career path: Build portfolio of clients, transition to full-time, or consult long-term

Downsides:

• Income gaps between contracts
• No benefits
• Constant hustle for next gig

Quality of Experience

For job seekers:

• Same as in-house recruiters (you probably won’t know they’re contractors)

For employers:

• Pros: Flexible; pay only when you need them; experienced talent
• Cons: Onboarding time; knowledge walks out the door when contract ends
• Best for: Short-term needs; specialized projects; filling gaps

Industry Respect Level

7/10. Respected for expertise and flexibility.

Examples

Individuals or small consulting firms. No big brand names.

Verdict: Good option for employers with temporary needs. Good option for experienced recruiters who want flexibility.

---

Species 7: University/Campus Recruiters (The Shepherds)

Also known as: Campus Relations, Early Career Recruiting

What They Do

University recruiters work for companies (or specialized firms) to recruit from colleges and universities.

They:

• Build relationships with career centers
• Attend career fairs
• Host on-campus events
• Manage internship programs
• Run entry-level hiring pipelines

How They Get Paid

Salary. Usually part of corporate TA or a specialized campus recruiting team.

Who They Serve

The employer, but with a developmental mindset.

They’re building talent pipelines for entry-level roles, so there’s less pressure and more relationship-building.

Work Environment (for recruiters)

Chill compared to other recruiting roles.

• Pay: $50K-$80K
• Culture: Friendly, educational, relationship-focused
• Workload: Seasonal (busy during fall/spring recruiting seasons)
• Respect: Moderate; seen as niche but important
• Career path: Move to broader TA roles or specialize in campus recruiting

Downsides:

• Repetitive (same schools, same fairs every year)
• Limited to entry-level roles
• Travel during peak seasons

Quality of Experience

For job seekers (students):

• Pros: Accessible; developmental; structured programs
• Cons: Competitive; limited to top schools (often)
• Red flags: Bait-and-switch (internship marketed, entry-level job delivered)
• Green flags: Clear timelines; structured process; genuine interest in development

For employers:

• Pros: Build early career pipeline; brand presence on campuses
• Cons: Long lead times; high competition for top students
• Best for: Companies with consistent entry-level hiring needs

Industry Respect Level

6/10. Respected but niche.

Examples

Amazon, Google, McKinsey, Deloitte campus recruiting teams.

Verdict: Good for students. Good career for recruiters who want stability and don’t want to cold-call.

---

Species 8: Staffing Agencies (The Bottom-Feeders)

Also known as: Temp Agencies, Contract Staffing, Volume Recruiters, The Ones Everyone Hates

What They Do

Staffing agencies are the Walmart of recruiting: high volume, low quality, commodity service.

They fill:

• Temporary positions (warehouse workers, call center reps, admin assistants)
• Contract roles (IT contractors, interim accountants)
• Temp-to-hire (maybe permanent, probably not)

They operate on a transactional model:

• Post jobs (many fake, to build databases)
• Collect resumes
• Spam candidates with irrelevant roles
• Lowball salaries using information asymmetry
• Submit whoever’s available
• Churn through candidates and clients

How They Get Paid

Two models:

1. Markup on hourly rate (for temp/contract):

• Pay worker $25/hour
• Bill client $40/hour
• Pocket $15/hour (60% markup)

2. Placement fee (for permanent):

• 15-25% of first-year salary
• But lowball the candidate to maximize margin

Recruiter compensation:

• Low base ($40K-$70K)
• Commission-driven (8-16% of fees generated)
• Must hit insane quotas to make decent money

Who They Serve

Themselves.

Employers get mediocre candidates at premium prices.

Candidates get lowballed, ghosted, and treated like inventory.

Recruiters get burned out and churn.

Only the agency wins.

Work Environment (for recruiters)

Toxic hellscape.

• Pay: $40K-$70K base; most make $50K-$90K total; top 10% make $200K-$500K
• Culture: Boiler room; high pressure; cutthroat; frat/sorority vibes
• Workload: Brutal (60+ hour weeks; expected to work nights/weekends)
• Respect: Zero (seen as bottom of recruiting)
• Career path: Burn out and leave, or become a sociopath who makes $500K

Characteristics:

• “Smile and dial” cold calling
• Taught to lie (yes, explicitly)
• Metrics obsession (calls per day, submittals, placements)
• High turnover (hire 10, 2 survive)
• Commission hunger drives unethical behavior

Quality of Experience

For job seekers:

• Pros: Sometimes get you a job (if you’re desperate)
• Cons: Ghosting, lowballing, fake jobs, bait-and-switch, disposable treatment, delayed payment
• Red flags: Everything (see our other articles)
• Green flags: Honestly? There are none. If you’re working with a staffing agency, you’re settling.

For employers:

• Pros: Fast fills for high-volume roles
• Cons: High turnover, mediocre quality, hidden costs, workers quit due to mistreatment
• Red flags: Fake job board, review manipulation, poor communication
• Green flags: Rare; most are interchangeable commodity vendors

Industry Respect Level

1/10. Universally despised.

Job seekers hate them. Employers tolerate them. Their own employees burn out. Even other recruiters look down on them.

Examples

• Robert Half (most complained about)
• TEKsystems (close second)
• Randstad
• Manpower
• Insight Global
• Adecco
• Kelly Services
• Procom
• Literally hundreds of others, all the same

Verdict: Avoid if at all possible. If you’re desperate, use them but protect yourself. If you’re an employer, you’re overpaying for commodity service. If you’re a recruiter, get out ASAP.

---

The Hierarchy: From Best to Worst

Let’s rank these by overall quality—combining ethics, candidate experience, employer value, and work environment for recruiters:

Tier 1: The Professionals

1. Executive Search Firms — Top of the food chain. Prestigious, ethical, high-touch.
2. Boutique/Specialist Recruiters — Deep expertise, relationship-driven, respected in their niches.

Tier 2: The Solid Citizens

3. Corporate/In-House Recruiters — Stable, aligned incentives, professional.
4. Independent Recruiters (the good ones) — Personalized service, flexible, entrepreneurial.

Tier 3: The Workhorses

5. Contract Recruiters — Project-based, flexible, professional but transient.
6. RPO — Outsourced but structured, better than agencies, not as good as in-house.
7. University/Campus Recruiters — Niche but stable, developmental focus.

Tier 4: The Dumpster

8. Staffing Agencies — Volume churn, toxic culture, universally hated, bottom of the barrel.

---

Comparison Table: At a Glance

---

Red Flags vs. Green Flags: How to Identify Each Breed

Executive Search

Red Flags:

• Approaching you for roles way below your level (not a real exec search)
• Asking for fees (real exec search is employer-paid)
• Pushy or transactional (they should be consultative)

Green Flags:

• Discrete, professional outreach
• Deep research on your background
• Clear about the role, client, and process
• Long-term relationship approach

Corporate/In-House

Red Flags:

• Disorganized process (reflects company culture)
• Ghosting after initial contact
• Unclear timeline or expectations

Green Flags:

• Responsive communication
• Transparent about process and timeline
• Clear about role, comp, culture

Boutique Specialist

Red Flags:

• Claim to specialize in everything (they don’t)
• Don’t demonstrate industry knowledge
• Push irrelevant roles

Green Flags:

• Deep expertise in one area
• Asks smart, informed questions
• Long-term relationship approach
• Transparent about fees and process

Independent

Red Flags:

• Generic cold outreach
• No specialization or expertise
• Pushy sales tactics
• Can’t provide references

Green Flags:

• Knows your work/background
• Specialized in your field
• Transparent about fees
• Strong reputation/referrals

Staffing Agency

Red Flags:

• Everything (see full articles on this)
• Fake job postings
• Bait-and-switch
• Ghosting
• Lowballing
• High-pressure tactics
• Poor communication
• Delayed payment
• Manipulated reviews

Green Flags:

• Honestly? There aren’t any. If you’re dealing with a staffing agency, you’re already compromising.

---

For Job Seekers: Which Should You Work With?

Priority order:

1. Apply directly to companies (work with in-house recruiters)
2. Boutique specialists in your field (if you’re in a niche)
3. Executive search (if you’re senior enough)
4. Good independents (if you have a referral/reputation check)
5. RPO/Contract recruiters (you probably won’t know the difference from in-house)
6. Campus recruiters (if you’re a student/recent grad)
7. Staffing agencies (only if desperate, and protect yourself)

Never:

• Pay a recruiter to find you a job (scam)
• Sign exclusive agreements without reading carefully
• Accept the first offer without researching market rates
• Trust promises without documentation

---

For Employers: Which Should You Hire?

Decision tree:

For C-suite/senior leadership: → Executive search firms (worth the investment)

For ongoing hiring needs: → In-house recruiters (build the team)

For specialized/hard-to-fill roles: → Boutique specialists or good independents

For short-term projects: → Contract recruiters

For high-volume/scaling: → RPO (if you don’t want to build in-house)

For entry-level pipeline: → Campus recruiting programs

For commodity roles you’re desperate to fill: → Staffing agencies (but know you’re overpaying for mediocre service)

Never:

• Use staffing agencies for specialized or senior roles
• Pay retained fees to agencies that operate like volume shops
• Accept lack of transparency on markup/fees
• Work with recruiters who ghost or lie

---

For Aspiring Recruiters: Which Should You Work For?

Best career paths:

1. Corporate/In-House — Best work-life balance, stability, benefits
2. Executive Search — Most prestigious, highest earning potential (if you can get in)
3. Boutique Specialist — Build deep expertise, good money, respected
4. Independent — Freedom and upside (once you have experience/network)
5. Contract/RPO — Flexibility, good experience
6. Campus — Stable, lower stress

Avoid:

• Staffing agencies — Toxic culture, high burnout, teaches bad habits, bottom of industry

Exception: Some people start at staffing agencies to learn the basics, then escape to better roles after 1-2 years. If you do this:

• Get out before you burn out
• Don’t learn their unethical tactics
• Build a real network, not just a database
• Use it as a stepping stone, not a career

---

The Bottom Line: Not All Recruiters Are Created Equal

The recruiting industry is not a monolith. It’s a spectrum from highly ethical professionals to bottom-feeding parasites.

The key distinctions:

Top Tier (Executive Search, Boutique Specialists, Good Independents):

• Build relationships over transactions
• Deep expertise in their domain
• Ethical practices (because reputation matters)
• Serve both employer and candidate well
• High respect, high compensation
• Sustainable business model

Middle Tier (Corporate, RPO, Contract, Campus):

• Professional, structured
• Employer-focused but ethical
• Stable career paths
• Decent respect and compensation
• Provide real value

Bottom Tier (Staffing Agencies):

• Volume over quality
• Transactional, churn-and-burn
• Unethical practices (lowballing, ghosting, fake jobs)
• Serve only themselves
• Zero respect, high burnout
• Parasitic business model

The difference matters.

As a job seeker, knowing which breed you’re dealing with helps you:

• Protect yourself from exploitation
• Prioritize your time and energy
• Spot red flags early
• Get better outcomes

As an employer, understanding the landscape helps you:

• Choose the right recruiting partner for each need
• Avoid overpaying for commodity service
• Get better hires with less drama
• Build sustainable talent pipelines

As a recruiter, knowing the hierarchy helps you:

• Choose where to build your career
• Avoid toxic environments
• Build the reputation you want
• Make money without selling your soul

If recruiters were dogs, you’d have your cane corsos, your Jack Russells, your teacup Paris Hilton dogs, and then some turn around and it’s a cat!  One thing’s for sure – they’re definitely different breeds!

Choose wisely.